MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7082154319 · doi:10.5284/1136236

Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment of Land at Mary Street, Sheffield, South Yorkshire

2005· article· en· W7082154319 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtant taxonExcavationQuarter (Canadian coin)Historic siteDocumentary evidenceChannel (broadcasting)Archaeological evidenceFactory (object-oriented programming)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In October 2005, ARCUS were commissioned by Escafeld Design on behalf of Andrew Fantom, to undertake a desk-based assessment on property at Mary Street, Sheffield, South Yorkshire (SK 3540 8660). The assessment included a site visit and buildings assessment, along with documentary and cartographic research. Mary Street is located within Sheffields Cultural Industries Quarter and the sites extant structures are deemed by Sheffield City Council to be Significant Buildings that contribute to Area Character. There is no archaeological or historical evidence for the proposal area prior to the sixteenth century. Documentary evidence from 1581 indicates that the site was part of an area called the Pastures. The earliest known development within the proposal area was the goit or artificial channel that crossed the site, carrying water from the Porter Brook to the dam of Cinderhill Wheel, a cutlers workshop first recorded in 1588. The goit remained an open channel until at least 1850 and may have been infilled only when the Cinderhill site was demolished in 1866. Prior to its canalisation and re-alignment during the late eighteenth century, the Porter Brook crossed the north-west part of the proposal area. The sites present-day western boundary was formed by the brooks canalisation during this period. Cartographic evidence indicates that the site was undeveloped land in 1841 but contained several allotments and associated structures by 1850. Mary Street had been developed by 1879 and the site was occupied by the Cyprus Works file manufactory and Hammer Works tool factory in 1890. During the early twentieth century, the proposal areas eastern plot was the site of the Guion Works tool factory, which was extended subsequently and became the Union Works, a machine knife factory. This complex was demolished during the final quarter of the twentieth century. The sites western plot had acquired the name Hawk Works by 1905 and operated as a cutlery and machine knife factory throughout the twentieth century. Several phases of structural redevelopment have taken place during the latter half of that period, with the demolition of nineteenth-century industrial features such as the factory chimney and the remodelling of aspects of the building fabric. The extant buildings, while modified and restructured throughout the twentieth century, do retain a number of features relating to the nineteenth-century complex. Depending on the extent of landscaping works relating to the creation of Mary Street and subsurface disturbance associated with the construction of the nineteenth- century buildings, there could be a high potential for the survival of subsurface archaeological remains associated with the Cinderhill goit. The extent to which the demolition of the Union Works removed associated subsurface features is unclear and the archaeological potential for the survival of remains relating to the nineteenth- century tool manufactory is thus deemed to be moderate to good. Further archaeological work would be required to determine the nature and extent of any such deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score0.877

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.007
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207