MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7082275244 · doi:10.14288/1.0450110

Chancellor Boulevard – East Mall Intersection Redesign

2025· article· en· W7082275244 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoulevardPedestrianIntersection (aeronautics)RedevelopmentGateway (web page)SketchRoundaboutPlan (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TransitFlow prepared this construction design package for UBC’s redesign of the Chancellor Boulevard – East Mall intersection at the Point Grey campus. Priorities include pedestrian and cyclist safety, traffic calming, rainwater capture, and creating a welcoming gateway presence. The design underwent an extensive iterative process to meet design requirements. The intersection was redesigned as a roundabout using curvature to slow traffic, directly enhancing pedestrian and cyclist safety. To further the safety of pedestrians and cyclists, raised crosswalks with pedestrian crossing lights and bike lanes have been incorporated. To prevent erosion of the Point Grey cliffs, the Chancellor Boulevard – East Mall intersection features a rain garden and drainage system leading to a storage tank. At the roundabout’s center, a UBC Thunderbird-inspired gateway sign, reflecting Indigenous artistry, symbolizes the importance of UBC’s connection with Indigenous culture. The design adheres to the TAC, City of Vancouver, BC MoTI and Infrastructure guidelines. The construction will unfold in 3 phases starting on May 5th 2025, and completing on November 26th 2025. To allow the intersection to remain operational throughout construction a traffic management plan has been developed for each phase to minimize traffic flow interference. The Class A cost estimate projects the project to cost $5,645,000. Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as well as their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a student project/report and is not an official document of UBC. Furthermore readers should bear in mind that these reports may not reflect the current status of activities at UBC. We urge you to contact the research persons mentioned in a report or the SEEDS Coordinator about the current status of the subject matter of a project/report.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0650.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→