MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7082420850

Jarðvarmamat svæðis í Vestur Alberta og samanburður á nýtingarmöguleikum miðað við skipti úr óendurnýjanlegum orkugjöfum

2018· other· en· W7082420850 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSkemman · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWellheadGeothermal energyGeothermal gradientFossil fuelThermal energyThermal power stationRange (aeronautics)Power stationHeating system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Geothermal resources can be employed in service of either direct-use heating applications or indirect-use power generation. This study applies a non-renewable energy savings approach to the evaluation of a prospective geothermal reservoir near the town of Hinton in Western Alberta, Canada. The energy content of the resource is estimated and two exclusive development options – power generation and space heating – were modelled and analysed. Monte Carlo simulations were used to determine an estimated wellhead thermal output of 226 MWth at 95% cumulative probability for a project lifetime of 50 years. The thermal power was converted to a brine flow rate of 540 kg/s at the reservoir average temperature of 118°C. A binary power plant was modelled and optimized in EES using the estimated geothermal flow. The resulting n-butane power plant model produced 12.1 MWe net power with a seasonal range of 9.5-16.1 MWe. The model operated at a thermal efficiency of 9.2% and functional and overall second law efficiencies of 36.4% and 20.0% respectively. A residential district heating system was modelled in EES using a 80 / 40 / -20 design criteria. The design resulted in a system capable of heating over 18,000 houses year-round, with excess energy available to potential industry partners. The heating system operates at 92.4% thermal efficiency under design conditions. The power plant scenario provides 108 GWh annually, translating to a fossil fuel energy content savings of 649 TJ per year. The district heating option provides a potential of 3840 TJ of thermal energy annually, resulting in a fossil fuel savings of approximately 4267 TJ – an increase of 557% from the power generation scenario. In total, the prospective heating network would then save 213 PJ (5.76B m3 natural gas) of non-renewable energy, more than six times the 32.4 PJ (0.87B m3 natural gas) saved by the power generation scenario. Alternatively, if designed to serve only the residential energy needs of the nearby town of Hinton, the power plant could provide 100 TJ/year for almost 200 years and the heating system 301 TJ/year for over 630 years. The results of this case study analysis are applicable to any similar community located within an energy economy dominated by fossil fuels. The seminal finding from the study is the conclusion that the non-renewable energy payback of direct-use application was 6.6 times that of the indirect application. Using available geothermal resources to replace space heating most readily fulfills the objective of displacing the maximum amount of non-renewable energy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSkemmanSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207