MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effectiveness of Lifestyle Interventions on Healthy Aging in Older Adults: A Global Meta-Analysis with Implications for Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030

2025· article· en· W7082439848 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Carcinogenesis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeodetic Measurements and Engineering Structures
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosocialLife expectancyPsychological interventionHealthy ageingPopulationPopulation ageingHealthy agingDiseaseIntervention (counseling)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background:: With the world population rapidly aging, healthy aging has become a matter of population health, especially in countries such as Saudi Arabia, where Vision 2030 seeks to raise life expectancy and health outcomes. This paper proposes a detailed meta-analysis determining the efficacy of lifestyle (e.g., physical activity, nutrition education, and psychosocial support) intervention on health outcomes in older adults with national policy planning implications. Methods::The reviewed data were gathered using peer-reviewed publications or studies published between 2023 and 2025 and national surveys that covered the Saudi Health Survey and GASTAT reports. The research quantitatively examined 16 lifestyle-based interventions that addressed adults aged 60 and older, which included chronic disease management, physical frailty, mental health, and self-reported health. The statistical tests of the difference between the pre-intervention and post-intervention change were t-tests such as paired t-tests and a p-value of less than or equal to 0.05. Results:The outcomes indicate that there are critical changes improving a number of health indicators. Compliance of the physical activity improved by 17 percent (p < 0.01), control of blood pressure improved by 13 percent (p = 0.03), and self-management in the chronic illnesses improved by 15 percent (p < 0.01). The prevalence of sarcopenia decreased at 9 percent, and the salt intake in the diet decreased at 19 percent (p < 0.05). Additionally, the quality-of-life scores went up by 30 percent due to intervention. These results are consistent with the global standards of Japan, South Korea, and Canada confirming the effectiveness of community-based and adapted to the culture techniques. Conclusion:Lifestyle interventions provide important physical and psychological health outcomes in aging individuals. Having noted that the health dangers continue to persist otherwise, with a vast prevalence of hypertension and low physical activity, the findings are indications of how proactive and integrative health promotion can be transformative.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it