MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7082632266 · doi:10.1109/comst.2025.3612388

Integrated Sensing, Communication, and Computation for IoV: Challenges and Opportunities

2025· article· en· W7082632266 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBIM and Construction Integration
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersScience and Technology Innovation Foundation of HarbinNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBottleneckRedundancy (engineering)ComputationResource (disambiguation)System integrationData integrationService (business)Automation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The trend of coordinated development of intelligent and connected vehicles is driving the continuous expansion of application scenarios and service functions for the Internet of Vehicles (IoV). The IoV has evolved from basic in-vehicle information services to intelligent networking, enhancing perception and decision-making. It is now developing towards coordinated vehicle-infrastructure control with moderate sensing and decision-making. However, the traditional separation of sensing, communication, and computation functions—and even their pairwise integrations, such as Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC), Integrated Communication and Computation (ICC), and Integrated Sensing and Computation (ISC)—create systemic inefficiencies like data redundancy and resource imbalance, which pose a critical bottleneck to the advancement of IoV. The unique characteristics of the IoV, particularly its mission objectives centered on safety and sensing, and the highly dynamic, resource-constrained network environment—compound these systemic inefficiencies, necessitating a dedicated investigation into an IoV-specific ISCC paradigm. Motivated by this, this paper provides the first in-depth, IoV-centric survey of the ISCC paradigm. First, we comprehensively review the development trajectory of the IoV, and based on this evolutionary path, define and categorize the development of ISCC into three distinct phases—Collaborative, Fusion, and Integrated—to clarify its integration process. Second, we analyze the limitations of partial integration paradigms (ISAC, ICC, ISC) and then establish a comprehensive taxonomy of ISCC implementation pathways, encompassing both physical-layer signal integration and network-level task-oriented resource management. Third, we survey the preliminary applications and research on the ISCC in the IoV and related fields. Finally, we outline the challenges and potential solutions to facilitate the realization of the ISCC in the IoV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.010
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications Surveys & TutorialsSame topicBIM and Construction IntegrationFrench-language works237,207