Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parmi les différentes avenues qui existent pour renforcer la collaboration entre les organismes communautaires et les milieux éducatifs, le jumelage interculturel est une option possible. Le jumelage interculturel vise à créer un contact intergroupe volontaire et il peut prendre place entre une famille nouvellement arrivée au Québec et une famille originaire de la société d’accueil. Ce jumelage peut devenir un levier pour soutenir le bien-être et la réussite éducative des enfants faisant partie des familles jumelées. C’est le cas de la famille de Mariam qui a été jumelée à celle de Camille, il y a quelques années par le Comité régional d’éducation pour le développement international de Lanaudière (CRÉDIL). Ces familles ont développé un lien fort qui a aidé les enfants de Mariam à faire leur entrée plus en douceur dans la structure de l’école québécoise. Cet article résume les récits d’expérience de ces personnes et il fait ressortir les retombées positives de cette relation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".