Characteristics of sensibilization in patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Frequency of visits of patients with pollinosis to the allergologist of the 6th City Clinical Hospital in Minsk showed that 49 % have sensitization to tree pollen, 66 % to grass pollen, 14 % to weed pollen. 29 % of patients have polysensitization to several groups of pollen allergens. An important part of the research on pollen allergens is to study new pollen allergens for the Republic of Belarus: canadian goldenrod, pellitory, thuja occidentalis, common juniper, ash-leaf maple, mountain pine, evergreen cypress. Four pollen seasons were identified in the pollen spectrum: spring (woody plants), springsummer (pine, juniper, thuja, cypress), summer (cereals), autumn-summer (weeds). A Belarussian pollen calendar in 2024 allows us to predict the frequency of exacerbations of hay fever, depending on the pollen concentration in the air.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".