MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7082967220 · doi:10.2478/wd-2025-0163

Bleiben oder gehen? Der Aufenthaltsstatus von Zugewanderten prägt Abwanderungsabsichten

2025· article· en· W7082967220 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWirtschaftsdienst · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidenceGermanImmigrationBureaucracyQuarter (Canadian coin)Social policyPosition (finance)Social integration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Germany is dependent on skilled immigration – but many immigrants consider leaving the country. New panel data shows that around a quarter of immigrants are considering leaving, especially those who are better integrated, have good German language skills, a high level of education and are employed. Legal residence status plays a key role: although permanent status offers security, it also increases mobility options. EU citizens and naturalised citizens are particularly likely to express intentions to emigrate. Those seeking protection, on the other hand, are less likely to express such plans – yet they are the ones who cite bureaucracy as a key motive for leaving. The results show that Germany must position itself not only as a country of immigration, but also as a country of residence – through less bureaucracy, better recognition procedures, targeted integration services and an open social climate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWirtschaftsdienstSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207