MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7082992673 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2025.3613390

UE Position Sensing in Non-LoS Propagation for U6G Wideband XL-MIMO Systems

2025· article· en· W7082992673 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaEuropean CommissionQueen's UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaQueen's University BelfastDepartment for the Economy
KeywordsNon-line-of-sight propagationPosition (finance)WidebandChannel (broadcasting)User equipmentWirelessJoint (building)Ultra-wideband

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to enhance the capacity of sixth generation wireless systems, the extremely large-scale multiple-input multiple-output (XL-MIMO) and upper-6 GHz (U6G) propagation are regarded promising technologies. It is imperative to recognize that the unique characteristics of U6G wideband XL-MIMO systems, including hybrid-field and beam squint effects, engender numerous challenges in channel estimation. However, it should be noted that these characteristics can also facilitate user equipment (UE) locating in non-line-of-sight (NLoS) scenarios. Consequently, a multiple-scatterer joint sensing algorithm is proposed. The near-field components are extracted from the hybrid-field channel firstly, and subsequently the spatial parameters are detected in a decoupled manner. The UE position is then effectively located based on the spatial geometry relation between the UE and multiple scatterers. The numerical results demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed UE localization algorithm in NLoS scenarios, while entailing reduced complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207