RIGHT-WING POPULISM IN CANADA: CURRENT DEVELOPMENT AND INFLUENCE ON THE MAIN POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article examines the current state of Canada’s political system from the perspective of the right-wing populism development. Right-wing populism has become a relatively new phenomenon in the Canadian political process, quickly gaining a foothold in the party system as the People’s Party of Canada, as well as the regional social movements and parties. Since the 2021 elections, right-wing populism is still on the Canadian agenda, influencing the Canadian traditional “catch-all” parties, the Liberal Party of Canada and the Conservative Party. Based on the latest development trends in Canada, the internal reasons for the amplifying distrust of the federal authorities and the established status quo, the paper analyzes the correlation with the growth of right-wing populism, the emergence of populist politicians or the politicians using populist rhetoric within the Conservative Party. The points of growth of right-wing populism have been identified and an attempt has been made to forecast its prospects on the eve of the 2025 Parliamentary elections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it