THE NEED FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATORS AND PARENTS PARTNERSHIP IN EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION IN NIGERIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has been observed that most early childhood education providers in Nigeria seem not the understand the roles of parents and guardian in providing quality education for early childhood pupils. Quality early childhood programs can change the trajectory of a child’s health and well-being. Early years education lays a solid foundation for a child’s lifelong learning journey. It shapes their cognitive, social, and emotional development in so many ways. This will be possible when there is synergy between the school, teacher and the parents/guardian. Partnership involves parents, families and practitioners working together to benefit children. Each recognizes, respects and values what the other does and says. Partnership involves responsibility on both sides. This paper looked at the two important building blocks of positive partnerships between the school, teacher and the parents; family centered and communication. The paper also discussed the need for partnership in early childhood education in Nigeria and how to promote partnership among school management early childhood educators and parents. The paper recommends that all early childhood education schools in Nigeria should constitute a formidable parent-teachers forum, while the Nigerian Association of Early Childhood Education providers should collaborate with relevant authorizes to organize seminars and workshops for parents/guardian on their roles and responsibilities to support their child’s education and collaborate with all institutions offering Early Childhood to organize Seminars/workshop for early child educators on how to partner with parents
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".