MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7083025259 · doi:10.20381/ruor-31403

In Search of Home: Housing Crisis in Ottawa and its Effects on Government-Assisted Refugees

2025· dissertation· en· W7083025259 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Ottawa - Library · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFace Recognition and Perception
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecarityRefugeeImmigrationTimelineDisplaced personPoliticsWelfareParticipant observationArgument (complex analysis)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this thesis, I examine how Government-Assisted Refugees (GARs) from different countries, who arrived in Canada under the Resettlement Assistance Program (RAP), have resettled in Ottawa amidst an unprecedented housing crisis. Drawing on two bodies of scholarship, political anthropology and Critical Refugee Studies (CRS), and anthropological fieldwork conducted between July 2023 and January 2025, I trace the effects of this crisis on GARs' experience of resettlement. Drawing upon my participant observation at the Catholic Center for Immigrants (CCI), interviews with GARs, CCI and RAP employees, and community volunteers, I argue that Canada's resettlement process generates new forms of displacement and food precarity by enforcing an unrealistic one-year timeline for independence. The thesis develops this argument across three chapters: the first chapter traces housing and resettlement policies from the perspective of CCI and RAP employees. I examine GARs' experiences from their initial arrival to their move to more permanent housing. By focusing on GARs' agency, I demonstrate how they engage with regulations to find their desired homes. Finally, the last chapter delineates the hidden effects of the housing crisis, including food insecurity. By following GARs' resettlement process, from their first step at CCI to their permanent housing, I examine policies, welfare programs, benefits, the housing market, and state-led institutions as assemblages. Through this exploration, I document how some GARs manage to find their desired home in Canada, while others experience ongoing displacement and precarity. Additionally, I attempt to shed light on CCI and RAP employees' experiences of working in the midst of a housing crisis and policy ruptures to facilitate GARs' resettlement. Their recommendations and insights are intertwined with GARs' narratives in this thesis's chapters. Finally, I focus on GARs' agency and homemaking strategies among the obstacles that they face from their first day of arrival in Ottawa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0220.014
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.010
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Ottawa - LibrarySame topicFace Recognition and PerceptionFrench-language works237,207