MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7083172496 · doi:10.1109/tap.2025.3611283

An Ultraminiaturized Self-Quadruplexing Antenna for Next-Generation Wireless Implantable Devices

2025· article· en· W7083172496 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntenna (radio)Specific absorption rateLink budgetWirelessTransmission (telecommunications)Antenna tunerMultiplexerDipole antennaTelemetry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work introduces a small self-quadruplexing antenna created for use in implantable medical devices (IMDs), capable of simultaneously and independently supporting transmission and reception across four different frequency bands without the need for any external multiplexer or switching circuitry. The proposed antenna operates at 868 MHz, 915 MHz [industrial, scientific and medical (ISM)], 1400 MHz [wireless medical telemetry service (WMTS) band] and 2450 MHz (ISM band) when Ports 1, 2, 3, and 4 are excited, respectively. The antenna is replicated inside a rectangular gadget that is situated inside a human phantom head model. It consists of four independently excited circular quadrants sharing a common ground plane, with compactness achieved through the use of shorting pins, strategically shaped slots and high dielectric substrate to reduce structure size. The total antenna volume is only 24.69 mm<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup>. Mutual coupling between any two ports is maintained below -23 dB. The antenna provides peak gains of -22.8, -25.3, 25.4, and -20.2 dBi at 868, 915, 1400, and 2450 MHz, respectively. To comprehend the antenna’s electromagnetic activity, Characteristic Mode Analysis (CMA) is used. To confirm that the antenna is suitable for implantation in the body, a specific absorption rate (SAR) analysis and a link budget analysis are carried out. The maximum 1 g SAR values are found to be within safe limits, while link margin analysis confirms the potential for reliable wireless communication in biomedical telemetry applications. By integrating multiple functions into a single structure, this self-quadruplexing design offers a novel and efficient alternative to conventional multiplexed systems in IMDs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.617

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207