MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7083177269 · doi:10.29173/css341

Introduction to the Retrospective Issue

2016· article· en· W7083177269 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Social Studies · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Psychology, and Social Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial studiesSelection (genetic algorithm)ChoseSocial knowledgeResearch methodology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This fall, Canadian Social Studies is capping off its twentieth year, with fifteen of those years as an open source online journal.In celebration, the Associate Editors have put together a selection of articles from the archives.It was difficult to choose from the outstanding contributions over the last two decades, but we have picked a selection to offer insights into the concerns of the past that still live with us today.Drawing inspiration from Gert Biesta ( 2010), the criteria we chose to pick these articles was guided by the following question: What might be educational about social studies education?In bringing forth articles that lend insight into this question, we were interested in exploring the aims and purposes of social studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.378 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Social StudiesSame topicEducation, Psychology, and Social ResearchFrench-language works237,207