MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7083198382 · doi:10.1002/ima.70214

Ant Colony Optimization‐Based Deep Ensemble Learning Model for Improved Gastrointestinal Disease Detection

2025· article· en· W7083198382 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpretabilityEnsemble learningEnsemble forecastingRobustness (evolution)AdaptabilityConvolutional neural networkHyperparameterRandom forest

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Gastrointestinal (GI) disorders represent a significant challenge in healthcare, underscoring the necessity for more precise and effective diagnostic techniques. Conventional approaches, which often rely on single models, have demonstrated shortcomings in both accuracy and efficacy, often failing to detect the intricate and varied patterns linked to these diseases. To overcome these challenges, this study introduces a novel ensemble learning framework tailored for GI detection. The framework utilizes a three‐layer architectural approach that integrates Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), the Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm (ACO), and Weighted Aggregation Ensemble Techniques (WAET). The methodology unfolds in three key stages: First, multiple CNNs are fine‐tuned using transfer learning, while ACO optimizes the hyperparameters of each CNN to enhance model adaptability and performance. Second, the predictions from the top three optimized models are combined using WAET to strengthen the system's robustness in GI detection. Lastly, ACO is employed to optimize the weight assignment for each model during the ensembling process. We use a dataset of 6000 endoscopy images, enhanced by cropping and augmentation techniques to boost diversity and improve classification performance. Additional experiments on CP‐Child‐A and CP‐Child‐B show that the proposed ensemble model achieves superior performance, with an accuracy of 99.88% on the primary dataset and 98.75% and 100% on CP‐Child‐A and B, respectively. It outperforms traditional hybrid methods and state‐of‐the‐art approaches. The effectiveness of the model is further validated through interpretability techniques like Grad‐CAM and SHAP, providing insights into the decision‐making process. This approach enhances diagnostic accuracy and provides a robust, interpretable solution for automated detection of GI diseases, improving clinical decision‐making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Imaging Systems and TechnologySame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207