MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7083224613

The World Without Them

2025· other· en· W7083224613 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueGoldsmiths (University of London) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrame (networking)White (mutation)Extinction (optical mineralogy)White paperStock (firearms)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A documentary-style video that explores the extinction of stock footage images. The narrator offers commentary on the images’ behaviour, intricate habits, and the challenges that have placed them on the endangered list. These images form part of our visual cultural DNA—for better or worse—reinforcing biases and stereotypes. They serve as an archive of the present, now fuelling AI datasets to generate the next wave of imagery.AI-generated images do not merely coexist with traditional ones; they absorb and transform them through statistical processing, fundamentally altering this visual ecosystem. Currently the video has been shown in Tirana International Film Festival, AL, 2025 Festival International du Film d’Art, Montréal, CA, 2025 Videoex Festival, Zurich, 2025 White Frame Focus, online, 2025

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.939

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGoldsmiths (University of London)Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207