MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7083314993 · doi:10.1016/j.physb.2025.417808

Exploring oxygen dissociation on hexagonal boron nitride: Insight from high-temperature molecular dynamics simulation

2025· article· en· W7083314993 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysica B Condensed Matter · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsReaxFFDissociation (chemistry)Molecular dynamicsChemisorptionOxygenHexagonal boron nitrideAdsorptionActivation energy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN), known for its exceptional thermal and chemical stability, is widely used in high-temperature applications and as an encapsulation layer for other two-dimensional materials. This study examines the dissociation mechanisms of O 2 molecules on the h-BN surface, focusing on activation energies and minimum energy pathways at different adsorption sites using climbing-image nudged elastic band (CI-NEB) calculations. The results reveal several dissociation pathways with significant variations in activation barriers depending on site and configuration, including one low-barrier route favorable for surface reactions. Reactive molecular dynamics (RMD) simulations with the ReaxFF force field are employed to investigate oxidation behavior in multilayer h-BN at 900 K, 1200 K, and 1500 K. At 900 K, O 2 adsorbs without penetrating beneath the surface, while higher temperatures enhance dissociation and promote deeper oxygen incorporation. Charge analysis at elevated temperatures shows stronger chemisorption and electron transfer, forming a more uniform, chemically bonded oxygen layer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysica B Condensed MatterSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207