MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7083463385 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17209574

Causes and consequences of functional rarity from local to global scales

2021· report· en· W7083463385 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhysics and Engineering Research Articles
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)BiodiversityExtinction (optical mineralogy)EcosystemBiodiversity conservation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rarity has always fascinated conservation and evolutionary biologists with the goal to uncover species characteristics causing extinction risk. Recently, some results suggest that rare species may over-contribute to the diversity of traits within communities thus supporting irreplaceable roles while others show that rare species are functionally redundant with common species. Beyond the rarity of species, the rarity of functions played by species, coined as functional rarity, is thus key to understand the impact of biodiversity decline on ecosystem functioning. However, functional rarity still lacks a clear definition and a quantitative framework while its emergence and maintenance within communities is largely unknown. The aim of the FRB-CESAB FREE 1 working group was to advance the concept of functional rarity and examine the causes and consequences of functional rarity from local to global scales. This document summarizes in a few pages the group’s context and objectives, the methods and approaches used, the main findings, as well as the impact for science, society, and both public and private decision-making. _______________________ La crise de la biodiversité impacte en priorité les espèces rares, c’est-à-dire celles déjà menacées car leur distribution spatiale est très limitée. Les caractéristiques intrinsèques de ces espèces qui peuvent expliquer leur vulnérabilité face aux changements globaux restent mal connues malgré tout. En outre, une question se pose : quelle est la conséquence de la perte de ces espèces pour les écosystèmes et l’Humanité ? La question est loin d’être triviale dans la mesure où nous ne connaissons pas le rôle joué par les espèces rares au sein d’un écosystème. A l’inverse, nous ne savons pas qui porte des fonctions essentielles et potentiellement vulnérables au sein d’un écosystème. L'objectif du groupe de travail FRB-CESAB FREE 1 était de faire progresser le concept de rareté fonctionnelle et d'examiner les causes et les conséquences de la rareté fonctionnelle à l'échelle locale et mondiale. Ce document synthétise en quelques pages le contexte et les objectifs du groupe, les méthodes et approches utilisées, les principales conclusions ainsi que l'impact pour la science, la société, la décision publique et privée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPhysics and Engineering Research ArticlesFrench-language works237,207