MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7083575600 · doi:10.17323/tjhr.2025.2.27886

Libri Theologici in the Muravyov Library: on Russian Nobility Theological Interest Characteristics

2025· article· en· W7083575600 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTerritory Journal of Historical Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNobilityOfficerTRACE (psycholinguistics)Quarter (Canadian coin)Reading (process)Middle Ages

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article presents the findings of the research that deals with theological literature reading practices at the home library of the Muravyov family: Mikhail Nikitich Muravyov (1757–1807), a poet, one of the tutors of the Grand Dukes Alexander and Konstantin, the first trustee of Moscow University, and his son, the Decembrist Nikita Muravyov (1795–1843). The author attempts to trace back and distinguish reading patterns of “fathers and sons” and analyze the difference in the attitude to this literature that were characteristic to such extraordinary people: a nobleman of the time of Catherine the Great and a young officer that belonged to the generation of the first quarter of the 19th century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.773
Threshold uncertainty score0.864

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTerritory Journal of Historical ResearchSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207