MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7083581359 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17213672

SYNERGY «SCHOOL + UNIVERSITY»: NEW HORIZONS OF INTEGRATION OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS

2025· article· en· W7083581359 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeodetic Measurements and Engineering Structures
Canadian institutionsArcelorMittal (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoveltyCurriculumNew horizonsSubject (documents)Modular designProfessional developmentHigher educationProgressive education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modern challenges associated with the digitalization of society, the formation of a knowledge economy and the growing demands for the universality of graduates' competencies call into question the effectiveness of the traditional model of separating school and university as two isolated educational environments. In conditions where the boundaries between levels of education are becoming increasingly conditional, there is a need to build synergetic trajectories that allow schoolchildren not only to acquire subject knowledge, but also to master the fundamental foundations of managerial, economic and philosophical culture. The article substantiates the concept of introducing modular courses in management, economics, philosophy and administration in a simplified form into the school curriculum using the pass/fail system, which eliminates the impact on academic performance. Such an organizational model allows minimizing stress traditionally associated with assessment procedures, and at the same time stimulates interest in self-determination, reflection and early professional orientation. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the development of the "School-University 4.0" model, in which the integration of educational levels is understood not as a mechanical duplication of content, but as the creation of a cross-disciplinary environment for the formation of metacompetences - critical thinking, entrepreneurial outlook, the ability to manage projects and philosophical reflection. It is proposed to consider this model as a strategic tool for building "bridges" between general and higher education, reducing the "transition shock" and helping to prepare students for the intellectual and professional challenges of the 21st century. In practical terms, the article reveals the prospects for using the credit system within the framework of integrative disciplines, demonstrates its advantages for educational motivation and social maturity of schoolchildren, and also examines international analogues of pre-college programs ( Advanced Placement , International Baccalaureate , Foundation Year ) with their adaptation to local conditions. Thus, the synergy of "school + university" is positioned not only as an innovative educational experiment, but also as a necessary step towards the formation of an educational ecosystem capable of preparing individuals of the future - flexible, creative and ready for interdisciplinary challenges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it