MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7083719711 · doi:10.5376/mpr.2025.15.0016

Physiological Study on Root Adaptation and Recovery of Tissue-Cultured <i>Anoectochilus roxburghii</i> Seedlings after Transplanting

2025· article· en· W7083719711 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicinal Plant Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransplantingAdaptation (eye)SeedlingRoot (linguistics)Root system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anoectochilus roxburghii, a rare medicinal plant, has attracted widespread attention for its scarce resources and high cultivation difficulty.Tissue culture rapid propagation, has become the main seedling raising method, but the adaptation and recovery of the root system after transplantation remain a bottleneck.This study summarizes several regulatory mechanisms: the proportional relationship of hormones (IAA, CK, stellolactone), the accumulation of osmotic regulatory substances (proline, soluble sugar), and the activation of antioxidant systems (SOD, CAT, POD), which play an important role in alleviating transplant shock.Meanwhile, the upregulation of energy metabolism, the accumulation of secondary metabolites, and the absorption of mineral elements have been proven to be the key supports for the rejuvenation of root systems.Studies show that, a reasonable hormone ratio can shorten the recovery period of the root system.The accumulation of osmotic regulatory substances, and the enhancement of antioxidant enzyme activity, play a prominent role in the early recovery stage.In the later stage, light quality regulation and substrate improvement have shown obvious effects on the improvement of root function, and the overall adaptation of the plant.This study provides new ideas for the efficient cultivation and management of A. roxburghii, and also offers theoretical basis and guidance for its industrial promotion and resource protection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicinal Plant ResearchSame topicHigher Education Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207