Transformation of Artistic Drawings Into WLAN-Band Wearable Antennas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel concept of transforming complex and artistic geometries into antennas in the wireless local area network (WLAN) band is presented. Four artistic antennas are designed in the Wi-Fi band and measured. All antennas are based on the microstrip antenna concept. In order to be flexible for wearable applications, the antennas are embroidered on the textile material using conductive thread. Based on the composition of the textile material and their properties, some of the textile samples are finalized from several samples under test (SUT), which are further used in the antenna design. The dielectric constant of the SUT is extracted using the resonance technique. The solid copper ground (GND) plane is made of shielded fabric, which provides the required flexibility. A low power short-range WI-FI band communication system is designed for testing the transmission and reception authentication from the antennas embedded on several dresses. The simulated and measured performance of the antennas in terms of matching bandwidth, realized gain, radiation efficiency, and radiation patterns is presented, which shows good agreement (evaluated at 2.45 GHz).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".