Phaseolus maculatus Scheele 1848
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phaseolus maculatus Scheele (1848:465) [clade B;sect. Coriacei Freytag]. TYPE: F Lindheimer 263 (NEOTYPE: MO-1731163; ISONEOTYPES: BM, BRIT, CAN n.v., FI (in Herbarium Webbianum, no. 51931), G, GH-274635, K, MO-1731164, NA, NY, OXF, PH, TCD, UC-248307). In the large series of “Flora Texana exsiccata.367.Fasc.III” (Gillett & Shchepanek 1977), the specimen with more information (i.e., “Cibolo, 15 miles west of New Braunfels, Texas.”) is the one out of three kept at Missouri Botanical Garden, and A. Delgado-Salinas (1985) was right in selecting it as neotype, since according to his interpretation the holotype was lost in Berlin during WWII.This sprawling legume component of the grasslands of the Chihuahuan Desert from Texas down to Puebla (Gentry 1957) at 1500–2800 m has often been confused with P.ritensis, a closely related species of the same section; apart from the seedlings (Fig. 11) the differences between them have reported elsewhere (Buhrow 1983; Delgado-Salinas 1985; Freytag & Debouck 2002). Specimens: U.S.A. Arizona: LA McGill 5683 (ASU-187971). New Mexico: JT Columbus 432 (NMCR). Texas: P Manning 4082 (K). MEXICO. Chihuahua: HS Gentry 8252 (RSA-411984). Coahuila: DH Riskind 2099 (ANSM-51545). Sonora: EA Mearns 1637 (DS-35348). Durango: S González 3195 (IEB-145721). Zacatecas: DG Debouck 346 (K-1041740). San Luís Potosí: JG Schaffner 252 (PH). Aguascalientes: JN Rose 6197 (US-396010). Guanajuato: MC Johnston 2625 B (TEX-273258). Jalisco: R Ramírez-Delgadillo 1285 (IBUG-99837). Queretaro: R Hernández-Magaña 12035 (IEB-173103). Hidalgo: JN Rose 8318 (US-451812). Tlaxcala: H Vibrans 2267 (TEX-273253). Puebla: A Delgado-Salinas 1400 (TEX-273252).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".