MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7083864413

GM says it has 2,700 jobs for workers slated to be laid off

2018· other· en· W7083864413 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternet Archive (Internet Archive) · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic and Technological Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFactory (object-oriented programming)Work (physics)NegotiationGeneral motorsPlan (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

General Motorsâ plans to lay off 14,000 salaried and blue-collar workers might not be as bad as originally projected. General Motors now says that most of the factory jobs it was cutting, can now be saved.GM says only 600 factory jobs will be eliminated in the restructuring.Blue-collar workers will still lose jobs at four U.S. plants that'll be closed next year, but most can get work at eight other GM factories where jobs are being added. Some would have to relocate.GM still plans to lay off about 8,000 white-collar workers and another 2,600 factory workers in Canada.The company announced plans to end production at the U.S. factories and one in Ontario in November to cut costs and divert resources to development and manufacturing of trucks, SUVs and electric and autonomous vehicles.GMâs attempt to close the factories still has to be negotiated with the United Auto Workers union. General Motors says most factory jobs can now be saved. Only 600 factory jobs will be eliminated in restructuring. 4 plants will close next year. However, jobs are being added at 8 other GM factories. GM still plans to lay off about 8,000 white-collar workers. GM's plan aims to cut costs and divert resources to new developments. GM still needs to negotiate with United Auto Workers

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternet Archive (Internet Archive)Same topicEconomic and Technological InnovationFrench-language works237,207