MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7083884280

2018 03 19 Petition - Did University of Ottawa Persecute a Professor on its Faculty? with 2 Attachments

2018· other· en· W7083884280 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternet Archive (Internet Archive) · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPigment Synthesis and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPretextPersecutionGrading (engineering)Academic freedomNinthCredibility
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

19 March 2018 Petition to University of Ottawa, Canada, President Jacques Fremont - DID UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA PERSECUTE A PROFESSOR ON ITS FACULTY? The Issue A Petition in Support of Denis Rancourt Denis Rancourt was a professor in the department of physics at the University of Ottawa from 1987 until 2009. He occupied the highest academic rank of Full Professor beginning in 1997. Rancourt has published over 100 articles in leading scientific journals and taught thousands of students. He created the popular “Science in Society” course, which he taught in the largest auditorium on campus. In the classroom Rancourt moved beyond a dry expert treatment of the subject-matter into addressing social implications and professional responsibility. He also experimented with and implemented grading methods intended to be less oppressive and more likely to stimulate freedom of inquiry. Still, he scrupulously adhered to his professorial responsibilities. Rancourt was a staunch critic of university executives and defended students against institutional discrimination and racism. The university dismissed Rancourt in 2009 on the spurious pretext that he assigned top grades to all 23 students in one advanced physics course. However, each grade assessment was demonstrably based on the respective student’s academic performance. Rancourt’s union is still appealing the case in the courts. The university has done everything possible to derail the legal process as it spends without limit on lawyers from prestigious law firms. The university’s persecution of Denis Rancourt has been relentless. It has arrested him on campus for “trespassing” while he facilitated an event, and locked out all his research students from their laboratory and offices without warning. *** We, the undersigned, would want and expect the University of Ottawa to answer these questions: Why did the University of Ottawa spy on Denis Rancourt? The University enlisted a student spy (Maureen Robinson) to covertly surveil Denis Rancourt for more than one year while he was a professor. She provided weekly reports about Denis Rancourt to the university; used a false cyber identity (“Nathalie Page”); and falsely represented herself to third parties. The spy’s actions were condoned by her immediate supervisors: Dean André E. Lalonde and University Legal Counsel Michelle Flaherty (subsequently Chair of the Human Rights Tribunal for Ontario, now a law professor). The spy’s role was described by an Ontario appellate-court judge as “troubling at best.” Why did the University of Ottawa smear Denis Rancourt with a hired psychiatrist using misappropriated personal information? In 2008, University VP-Governance Nathalie Des Rosiers (subsequently Director of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, now Minister of the Environment for Ontario) coordinated a capture of Denis Rancourt’s intimate childhood information for use by a hired psychiatrist, to render a written “psychiatric opinion” of the professor without his consent or knowledge. The university did not inform Rancourt of its actions, and vigorously opposed his access to the psychiatric report until the final hour of an appeal in litigation for access in 2017. Why did the University of Ottawa destroy Denis Rancourt’s professional research? The University acknowledges that it destroyed Rancourt’s large and unique collection of scientific samples. He considered himself their custodian on behalf of the scientific community. Many of the samples were irreplaceable and priceless.[*] The Association of Professors of the University of Ottawa (APUO) has assumed a $1.25 million grievance concerning this destruction. *** It is Time for a Fair and Equitable Resolution We, the undersigned, believe that the University of Ottawa must immediately cease and desist from harassing Denis Rancourt. He deserves a reasonable settlement that will enable him to resume his professional work as an educator and scientist. --------------------------- [*] The hundreds of destroyed scientific samples included the only large non-oxidized piece of the Santa Catharina meteorite, in which the meteoritic metallic phase “antitaenite” was discovered; the only large sample of remnants of the K/T boundary meteorite that may have killed the dinosaurs; unique suites of synthetic layer silicate compounds; suites of loess-paleosol samples (ancient soils) from two sites, in China and Eastern Europe; preserved samples of sediments from 100 lakes in Canada, from the largest study of its kind in the boreal forest; synthetic compounds and alloys having unique electronic, magnetic, and magneto-volume properties. --------------------------- Tim Anderson - Senior Lecturer in Political Economy, University of Sydney Eva Bartlett - Independent journalist Peter Biesterfeld - Journalist, Now Magazine Toronto Ignacio Chapela - Associate Professor, Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley Edward C. Corrigan - Human rights lawyer, author and media commentator Yves Engler - Author, public intellectual Norman Finkelstein - Author, public intellectual Jesse Freeston - Documentary film maker and journalist Hazel Gashoka - M.A. Candidate, Health Policy & Equity, York University Mireille Gervais - Director, Student Rights Centre, Student Federation of the University of Ottawa Peter Gose - Professor, Carleton University Vigil Grandfield - Investigative journalist Joseph Hickey - Executive Director, Ontario Civil Liberties Association Claude Lamontagne - Retired Professor of Psychology, University of Ottawa Stephen Lendman - Journalist, USA Cynthia McKinney - US Congresswoman for 12 years, first African-American woman to represent Georgia in the House of Representatives Rick Mehta - Associate Professor of Psychology, Acadia University Mark Mercer - Full Professor; Chair, Department of Philosophy, Saint Mary's University; President, Society for Academic Freedom and Scholarship Adele Mercier - Associate Professor, Queens University Gary Metallic Sr - District Chief, Gespegawagi Overseers Tribal Council Marc Morano - Director, Climate Depot Robin Öberg - PhD Candidate, Anthropology, Exeter University Jeff Schmidt - Author of Disciplined Minds, and former Physics Today magazine staff editor Michel Seymour - Professeur titulaire, Université de Montréal Marc Spooner - Professor of Education, University of Regina Ken Stone - Activist, Hamilton, Ontario Julia Tourianski - Producer, Brave the World Jean-Marie Vianney - Coordonnateur, Union provinciale des minorités raciales et ethnoculturelles francophones -------------------------- Background links attached: - Academic Freedom? How Nasty Can a University Be? -By Denis Rancourt - A letter to President Fremont, with attachments

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it