MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Application of modified tragus incision in temporomandibular joint disc anchoring surgery

2024· article· en· W7084026077 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Inequalities and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemporomandibular jointDisplacement (psychology)Joint capsuleReduction (mathematics)CondyleMagnetic resonance imagingFibrous joint

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[Objective:] To introduce the surgical technique of temporomandibular joint disc anchoring through a modified tragus incision. [Methods:] From February 2017 to October 2021, 264 patients (328 sides of joints) with advanced anterior disc displacement without reduction (ADDWoR) admitted to our hospital were treated with temporomandibular joint disc anchorage using a modified tragus approach. The specific method was as follows: Use a modified intraauricular approach to separate the superficial temporal fascia and the deep and superficial layers of the deep temporal fascia, as well as the joint capsule, cut the joint capsule at the root of the zygomatic arch, expose the joint disc, using a Mini Mitek anchor screw to fix it at the posterior and lower pole of the condylar process, and using two Orthocor sutures for horizontal mattress suture to reposition the anterior displaced joint disc. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the temporomandibular joint was performed before and within 7 days after surgery. The facial nerve condition was observed from 1 to 7 days after surgery, follow-up MRI was performed 3 months after surgery, and the mouth opening degree was recorded at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to record the relief of temporomandibular joint pain in patients at 3 months after surgery. The vancouver scar scale was used to evaluate the scar condition in the surgical area at 3 months after surgery. [Results:] According to the evaluation of postoperative MRI, 306 joints (249 cases) were evaluated as "excellent", 20 joints (14 cases) were evaluated as "good", and 2 joints (one case) were evaluated as "poor". The successful reduction rate was 99.39% (326/328 sides). Only one patient evaluated as "poor" after surgery, accounting for 0.61% (2/328 sides). At the 3-month follow-up after surgery, all patients showed improvement in limited mouth opening, with pain scores below 2 and scar evaluations below 3. [Conclusion:] Improving the concealed position of the incision inside the tragus and achieving good results in the reduction of the temporomandibular joint disc is a widely applicable surgical approach for temporomandibular joint disc anchoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.466
GPT teacher head0.579
Teacher spread0.113 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicMathematical Inequalities and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207