Numerical Simulation Study on the Descaling Mechanism of High-Pressure Swirling Jet
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To further explore the active mechanism of swirling jet， a numerical model of swirling jet descaling was built， and its effectiveness was verified by comparing with experimental results. Then， the difference in flow field characteristics between swirling jet and conventional straight jet was compared， and the mechanism of overflow and erosion in the process of swirling jet descaling was revealed. Finally， the influence of pump pressure， target distance and jet angle on the descaling performance was analyzed. The study results show that the special nozzle structure determines the three-dimensional velocity distribution characteristics of the swirling jet. The swirling jet has a similar impact crushing capacity and a larger impact area as the conventional straight jet. An increase in pump pressure can significantly improve the descaling performance of the swirling jet， the target distance has an optimal value for affecting the descaling performance， and moderately increasing the jet angle can further promote the descaling effect. The study results provide reference for the optimal application of swirling jet in descaling operations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".