MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7084043202 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.8058604

Cataloging the potential functional diversity of Cacna1e splice variants using long-read sequencing

2025· other· en· W7084043202 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical and Chemical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsspliceRNA splicingAlternative splicingExonENCODEChannel (broadcasting)Function (biology)Gene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The degree to which alternative RNA splicing influences the function and structure of voltage gated calcium channel (VGCC) splice variants is poorly understood. Here we used long-read RNA-sequencing to catalog rat Cacna1e (Cav2.3) splice variants, and computationally prioritize which are likely to impact channel function. Result We sequenced Cacna1e transcripts from rat thalamus using Oxford Nanopore sequencing yielding the structure of 2,110 Cacna1e splice variants. Of these, up to 154 had the potential encode for a functional channel based on predicted amino acid sequences. Our analysis revealed a total of 31 cassette splicing events (in various combinations) potentially affecting channel function, with three cassette exons appreciably expressed and conserved. Conclusion Our work both provides the first long-read sequencing of Cacna1e and the first computational evaluation of Cacna1e splice variants for future follow-up. This overall strategy to provide the field with prioritized transcripts will improve our understanding of Cacna1e function, its role in disease pathophysiology, and serve as a general approach to evaluate splice variant function across multiple ion channel types.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3940.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicBiomedical and Chemical ResearchFrench-language works237,207