MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Novel Joint Multistage Handover Strategy for DAPS-enabled LEO Satellite Networks

2025· article· en· W7084045618 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicClay minerals and soil interactions
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHandoverBandwidth allocationBandwidth (computing)Communications satelliteSimulated annealingSatelliteResource allocationBaseline (sea)Low earth orbitScheme (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Owing to the exponential growth in the number of satellites, developing effective handover strategies and resource allocation techniques has become crucial for Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite networks. In response to the high data-rate demands of User Equipment (UE), we propose an LEO-based Dual Activate Protocol Stack handover scheme (LDAPS). This innovative architecture leverages the DAPS mechanism to enhance throughput, reduce handover interruptions, and ensure seamless connectivity for UEs. The initial problem is decomposed into two subproblems: employing an Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) to address bandwidth allocation and utilizing a simulated annealing algorithm to optimize the handover strategy. Furthermore, we introduce a multi-stage handover system that accommodates dynamic propagation conditions between satellites and UEs. We validate the performance of the proposed methods for bandwidth allocation and handover optimization through extensive comparative studies. Our results demonstrate that these algorithms significantly outperform baseline methods, highlighting their potential to enhance user experience and optimize system performance in LEO satellite networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClay minerals and soil interactionsFrench-language works237,207