Application of machine learning models in predicting prognosis after mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective Based on real⁃world clinical data, the predictive efficacy of the unweighted machine learning (ML) models for the prognosis of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation (AIS⁃aLVO) patients after mechanical thrombectomy was evaluated. The optimal model was selected, and the impact of class⁃weighted strategies on the predictive efficacy of this model was assessed. Methods A total of 191 patients with AIS⁃aLVO who underwent mechanical thrombectomy from May 2023 to September 2024 in Tianjin Huanhu Hospital were included. Collect their clinical data, such as pre⁃admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, etc. Retrospectively analyze the brain non⁃contrast CT (NCCT), multi⁃phase CT angiography (mCTA) and CT perfusion (CTP) examinations of the patients upon admission. The mCTA was used to assess the collateral circulation status; the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) was used to evaluate the early ischemic changes in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) supply area based on the NCCT; the CTP was used to assess the cerebral perfusion status, and the Mismatch volume, Tmax > 4 s volume, Tmax > 6 s volume, Tmax > 8 s volume and Tmax > 10 s volume were obtained. The 90⁃day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score after surgery was used as the prognostic evaluation index, and the score > 2 was determined as poor prognosis. The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was used for feature selection. Logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), k⁃nearest neighbor (KNN), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithms were used to construct unweighted models. The predictive efficacy of the models was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve (Brier score), and decision curve analysis (DCA). The optimal model was selected, and the Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) method was used to analyze the feature importance of this model. At the same time, the impact of the class⁃weighted strategy on the predictive performance of the model was evaluated. Results The optimal regularization parameter (λ = 0.064) of LASSO regression was determined by the ten⁃fold cross⁃validation minimum deviation criterion. Four feature variables were selected: ASPECTS score, Tmax > 10 s volume, pre⁃admission NIHSS score, and poor collateral circulation status. Stratified sampling was used to randomly allocate the subjects to the training set (n = 133) and the test set (n = 58), and unweighted models was established. In the unweighted model, except for the overfitting RF and XGBoost models, the Delong test showed that the pairwise comparison of the AUC values of the remaining models had no statistical significance (P > 0.05, for all); however, the unweighted SVM model had the lowest Brier score (0.16), and its calibration ability was the strongest. Within the 15%-30% threshold range, the DCA curve of the unweighted SVM model was the highest, suggesting the highest clinical applicability. There was no statistically significant difference in the AUC values, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value between the class⁃weighted and unweighted SVM models (P > 0.05, for all); however, compared with the unweighted SVM model, the Brier score of the class⁃weighted SVM model was higher (0.17 vs. 0.16), and its calibration ability was weakened. Conclusions In a real⁃world cohort of AIS⁃aLVO cohort, the unweighted SVM model can accurately predict poor functional outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy without relying on class⁃weighted, and this method has high clinical translational potential.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".