MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Activities of the Ukrainian Canadian Congress and the Canadian-Ukrainian Foundation, Aimed at Implementing Humanitarian Aid Projects for Ukrainians Affected by the Full-Scale Russian Invasion of Ukraine

2025· article· uk· W7084082852 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUkrainian Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicListeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Process (computing)Identification (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Relevance of the research. The Ukrainian diaspora in Canada, which numbers over 1.3 million people according to official data, is one of the most organised Ukrainian diasporas abroad. This organisation has manifested itself, in particular, in active efforts to support Ukraine and the Ukrainian people during the period of resistance to Russian aggression and its most active phase, which began in February 2022 and continues to this day – the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine. The focus of our attention, given the importance of the international community's support for Ukraine and the provision of assistance to Ukrainians affected by the hostilities in Ukraine, has been the humanitarian initiatives during the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine implemented with the support of such leading organisations of the Ukrainian diaspora in Canada as the Ukrainian Canadian Congress and the Canada-Ukraine Foundation. The Ukrainian Canadian Congress and the Canada-Ukraine Foundation, which closely coordinate their efforts, actively provided assistance to Ukraine and Ukrainians in the context of the Russian Federation's hybrid aggression in 2014-2022. With the start of the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the scale of the diaspora's humanitarian initiatives has increased significantly in response to new challenges. The purpose of this publication is to examine the implementation of relevant initiatives and projects by the Ukrainian diaspora in Canada and their significance for supporting Ukraine and Ukrainians in the context of the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine. Conclusions. Humanitarian aid organised during the full-scale Russian invasion by leading organisations of the Ukrainian diaspora in Canada focused on many areas: provision with food, medicine and hygiene products to people who need it most, in particular residents of frontline territories and the elderly; assistance to internally displaced persons; support of rehabilitation centres for children and adults; supplying gluten-free food kits for children with special needs; programmes to support the Ukrainian population during the heating season (providing the population with wood-burning stoves, power banks, purchasing generators); assistance to the State Emergency Service of Ukraine; response to specific serious challenges related to the course of full-scale aggression by the Russian Federation against Ukraine, such as assistance to residents of territories affected by the destruction of the Kakhovka Hydroelectric Power Plant, fundraising for the restoration of the Okhmatdyt Children's Hospital. In addition to humanitarian aid programmes in Ukraine, the Ukrainian diaspora in Canada cares for Ukrainians who moved to Canada, in particular by helping them to adapt to new realities and advocating to the Canadian government for the preservation of the rights provided by the CUAET programme. The study of the scale and areas of assistance provided by the Ukrainian diaspora in Canada makes it possible to assess the opportunities and prospects for cooperation with it in the context of implementing projects for the post-war reconstruction of Ukraine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUkrainian StudiesSame topicListeria monocytogenes in Food SafetyFrench-language works237,207