[ARTICLE] Cascade Tank Pressurization Method for Satellite-Delivering Rockets (Canadian Applied Physics Journal / 2025)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Satellite-delivering rockets share a common problem --- the dependency of pneumatic systems on electric networks driven by onboard computers that can fail and cripple/render the rocket inert. One such example is the propellant tank's pressurization system. This article presents a novel approach entitled the Cascade Tank Pressurization Method, that solves this problem by iteratively discharging in a domino effect a cluster of composite overwrapped pressure vessels triggered in series. A Piping & Instrumentation Diagram is available. One-dimensional pneumatic analysis conducted on various size clusters show a fine control --- of ullage pressure to a predefined target bandwidth --- without any computer controls. Ultimately, a disruptive fully-pneumatic self-regulated tank pressurization system is presented, enabling the option for a more computer-decoupled rocket architecture.<br><br>The article was recently published in the open-source Canadian Applied Physics Research: https://doi.org/10.5539/apr.v17n2p40-------------------------------------------------------------------------For more public data, please visit my Figshare profile: https://figshare.com/authors/Luis_Teia/10811244
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".