MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7084100318 · doi:10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20250175

Comparative analysis of storage properties and pectin metabolism between Zhufeng and Huanghuayou papaya varieties

2025· article· en· W7084100318 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicOrthoptera Research and Taxonomy
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPectinPectinasePostharvestSofteningHueRespiration rateTitratable acidCold storagePectinesterase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[Objective] The aim of this study was to investigate the physiological processes involved in post-harvest softening of papaya fruit and to understand the factors leading to differences in storage characteristics between two varieties. The results will serve as a reference for improving papaya preservation during storage and transportation, and for breeding high-quality and storage-resistant varieties. [Methods] Using Zhufeng and Huanghuayou papaya fruits as experimental materials, physiological indicators, such as color parameters (a*, hue angle, color index, and chroma), firmness, water loss rate, respiration rate, ethylene production, TSS and TA contents, were measured during post-harvest storage. The levels of protopectin, water-soluble pectin (WSP), covalent-soluble pectin (CSP), and ionic-soluble pectin (ISP) were analyzed, and the activities of pectin methylesterase (PME), polygalacturonase (PG) and pectin lyase (PL) were examined. Gene expression levels related to PMEs and PGs were also determined to identify the main factors contributing to the differences in storage characteristics between the two varieties. [Results] During storage, both papaya varieties showed color changes and fruit softening. In terms of appearance, the hue angle of both varieties decreased, while the a* value and color index gradually increased, with the skin color changing from green to yellow. At later stages of storage, Zhufeng showed an orange-red color, while Huanghuayou showed an orange-yellow color. In terms of storage performance, the firmness of both Zhufeng and Huanghuayou papaya fruits gradually declined during storage. Huanghuayou exhibited rapid softening, with firmness dropping sharply to below 10 N within 0-7 days after harvest (DAH), before slowing down in the later storage phase. In contrast, Zhufeng demonstrated superior storage resistance, maintaining higher firmness and only decreasing below 10 N after 11 DAH. Throughout the entire storage period, Zhufeng consistently retained greater firmness compared to Huanghuayou. As storage progressed, respiration rates increased for both varieties, but the rate for Zhufeng remained significantly lower than that of Huanghuayou. Water loss analysis showed that during the initial storage period, Huanghuayou had a higher rate of water loss compared to Zhufeng, whereas at the later stages, Zhufeng exhibited a higher water loss rate than Huanghuayou. Additionally, ethylene release followed a peak-like pattern in both varieties, with Zhufeng reaching its ethylene peak at 7 DAH, three days later than Huanghuayou. These results suggested that Zhufeng displayed slower softening, a lower respiration rate, a delayed ethylene peak, and overall better storage characteristics. After 11 DAH, Zhufeng preserved higher TSS content and lower TA levels, maintaining its commercial value and offering a shelf life of up to 11 days under normal conditions. Significant differences in pectin components and related enzyme activities were observed between the two cultivars. During storage, protopectin contents in both Zhufeng and Huanghuayou papaya fruits steadily decreased, while the concentrations of WSP, CSP and ISP consistently rose. This suggested that protopectin hydrolysis occurred, generating WSP, CSP, and ISP, and caused gradual degradation of cell structure. Zhufeng fruit showed significantly higher protopectin content compared to Huanghuayou, while WSP and CSP contents were significantly lower; ISP content showed no significant difference. It suggested that the protopectin in Zhufeng papaya underwent minimal depolymerization during storage, allowing the fruit to retain its remarkable firmness, whereas ISP levels may not directly correlate with fruit firmness variations. During the storage period of Zhufeng and Huanghuayou papaya fruits, PME activity showed a steady upward trend. At 7-11 DAH, PME activity in Zhufeng fruits was notably lower compared to Huanghuayou. Polygalacturonase (PG) activity exhibited more pronounced changes, with a continuous increase throughout storage, while Zhufeng consistently demonstrated lower PG activity than Huanghuayou. These findings highlighted the critical roles of PME and PG in the softening process, with their activity levels possibly driving the distinct softening traits of the two varieties. However, PL activity showed no significant difference between the Zhufeng and Huanghuayou, indicating that it might not be responsible for the differences in softening. RT-PCR was used to investigate changes in the expression levels of six PG genes (CpPG1, CpPG2, CpPG3, CpPG4, CpPG5 and CpPG6) and five PME genes (CpPME1, CpPME2, CpPME3, CpPME4 and CpPME5) during the storage of Zhufeng and Huanghuayou papaya fruits. The analysis revealed that while CpPG3, CpPG4, and CpPME1 showed no detectable expression, the remaining genes displayed significantly different expression patterns between the two varieties. Gene expression analysis suggested reduced levels of CpPG2, CpPG5, CpPME2, CpPME4, and CpPME5 in Zhufeng compared to Huanghuayou. Additionally, CpPG1 and CpPG6 peaked later in Zhufeng, while CpPME3 was expressed at higher levels in Zhufeng than in Huanghuayou. This suggested that CpPME3 may play a key role in controlling the softening process in Zhufeng papayas. [Conclusion] Variations in protopectin, WSP and CSP levels, and PME and PG activities are the key factors contributing to the distinct storage characteristics of Zhufeng and Huanghuayou. Genes such as CpPG1, CpPG2, CpPG5, CpPG6, CpPME2, CpPME3, and CpPME4 may play a role in the post-harvest softening process across papaya varieties with different storage resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.357
GPT teacher head0.506
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicOrthoptera Research and TaxonomyFrench-language works237,207