MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7084105114 · doi:10.1101/2025.09.18.25335809

DLBCLone: A unified framework for neighbourhood-based genetic subtyping of lymphomas

2025· preprint· en· W7084105114 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenome Rearrangement Algorithms
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaSpinal Cord Injury BCSimon Fraser University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsSubtypingLimitingClass (philosophy)Genetic algorithmMutationContrast (vision)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Genetic subtyping of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has been slow to gain clinical adoption. Available classifiers either leave many tumours unclassified or depend on exome-wide features and copy-number profiles, which are not always available in routine practice. We introduce DLBCLone, a neighbourhood-based framework that enables panel-aware genetic subtyping compatible with existing taxonomies. DLBCLone learns a 2-D reference map of mutation profiles (UMAP) from a labeled training cohort, freezes this map, and deterministically projects new cases into the same latent space. Class labels are then inferred by weighted K-nearest neighbours, limiting over-assignment by considering the local density of unclassified neighbours. By default, classification thresholds optimize per-class balanced accuracy, but can be adjusted to suit study needs. The framework is intended to emulate (or “clone”) existing schemas such as LymphGen or DLBClass. Trained on a harmonized cohort of 2,130 DLBCLs, DLBCLone classifiers for different gene panels achieved consistently improve classification rates relative to fixed-threshold baselines while maintaining a reasonable per-class performance. On an in-house cohort of 323 patients, it assigned an additional 98 samples without compromising accuracy relative to LymphGen. On an external exome-sequenced subset from a 1,001-patient cohort, DLBCLone achieved a 51% classification rate (vs 36% for LymphGen) at an overall accuracy of 0.70. Compared with another LymphGen approximator (LymphPlex), DLBCLone reached a 74% classification rate (vs 55%). In general, the DLBCLone-reclassified tumours had molecular features consistent with their new labels. DLBCLone provides a deterministic, reproducible, and extensible approach to genetic subtyping under real-world constraints, facilitating prospective studies that rely on either targeted panels or more comprehensive sequencing strategies. DLBCLone is open source and available in the GAMBLR.predict package ( https://github.com/morinlab/gamblr.predict ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.205
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it