MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7084118592 · doi:10.14393/rbcv8n-79263

Editorial

2025· article· pt· W7084118592 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicListeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsState (computer science)Subject (documents)PopulationOrder (exchange)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No ano que se finda, conseguimos tornar realidade o maior sonho da nossa Sociedade a aquisição da SEDE PRÓPRIA e já se encontra em fase de conclusão o processo para o seu reconhecimento como UTILIDADE PÚBLICA; esperamos que o mesmo tenha chegado à conclusão em data bem próxima. Além desses dois fatos marcantes, podemos destacar entre as nossas participações e realizações: XII CONGRESSO INTERNACIONAL DE FOTOGRAMETRIA (Ottawa - Canadá), para o qual enviamos uma representação patrocinada pelo Conselho Nacional de Pesquisas e onde tivemos um magnífico stand montado com a colaboração do Projeto RADAM e da Lasa S/A; I ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE CARTOGRAFIA, no Rio Grande do Sul, realizado com a colaboração da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, uma confraternização extraordinária, com a participação de mais de 200 pessoas e várias organizações; a EXPOSICARTA/72, realizada simultaneamente com o I-ENC, naquela promissora cidade gaúcha, uma amostragem muito significativa do nosso desenvolvimento cartográfico; a XIII ASSEMBLÉIA-GERAL ORDINARIA, na qual foi criado o Núcleo Regional Sul, com sede em Porto Alegre, congregando já 220 associados, residentes nos estados do Paraná, Santa Catarina e Rio Grande do Sul.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.313
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3130.178

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.262
GPT teacher head0.573
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicListeria monocytogenes in Food Safety→French-language works237,207→