MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The potential impact of the next-generation COVID-19 mRNA-1283 vaccine in Canada

2025· article· en· W7084137939 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptical measurement and interference techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVaccinationIncidence (geometry)Public healthPopulationHealth careEconomic impact analysisEconomic evaluationDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With continued high disease burden in vulnerable groups and fiscal responsibility shifting to Canada’s jurisdictions, assessing the economic value of COVID-19 vaccines is critical for optimizing COVID-19 prevention. This study estimated the public health impact and economically justifiable price (EJP) of Moderna’s next-generation COVID-19 vaccine (mRNA-1283) versus no vaccination in Canada, and relative to currently authorized vaccines (mRNA-1273; BNT-162b2). The target population included individuals aged ≥65 years and 12–64 years at high-risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes, consistent with 2025/2026 national guidelines. Analyses were conducted using a static decision-analytic model (1-year horizon) from a publicly-funded healthcare payer perspective. Vaccine efficacy against infection and hospitalization for mRNA-1283 versus no 2024/2025 vaccination was based on mRNA-1283’s pivotal trial and mRNA-1273 real-world data. Clinical outcomes included infections, hospitalizations, deaths, and number needed to vaccinate (NNV); economic outcomes included total costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), and EJP at a $50,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Compared to no vaccine, annual vaccination with mRNA-1283 prevented 288,912 symptomatic infections (NNV = 15), 11,710 hospitalizations (NNV = 364), and 2,194 deaths (NNV = 1,944). The EJP for mRNA-1283 was $325 ($230–$771 in sensitivity analyses). Semi-annual dosing (≥65 or ≥80 years) averted additional hospitalizations and deaths compared to annual vaccination. mRNA-1283 prevented an additional 2,873–3,689 hospitalizations and 537–690 deaths compared to currently authorized vaccines. EJPs for mRNA-1283 were $78 and $103 when compared to mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2, respectively. This study does not include indirect effects, and mRNA-1283 effectiveness has not yet been validated in real-world studies. VE waning and incidence estimates are highly uncertain. British and American estimates were used as Canadian data proxies. mRNA-1283 could reduce the COVID-19 clinical burden and provide economic value for the NACI-recommended population, exceeding current mRNA vaccines; COVID-19 program planners may consider supporting access to mRNA-1283 to optimize public health impact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicOptical measurement and interference techniquesFrench-language works237,207