MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7084146513 · doi:10.4000/14l3d

Acte I : le contexte

2019· book-chapter· fr· W7084146513 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks · 2019
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicFiber-reinforced polymer composites
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity (music)Context (archaeology)Perspective (graphical)Meaning (existential)Subject (documents)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce premier acte est celui que l’on connaît généralement le mieux. C’est le mois d’août 1971 et Derrida est à Montréal, à l’Université de Montréal, pour être précis, afin de faire une conférence ou, mieux encore, afin de donner une « communication » au xve Congrès de l’Association des Sociétés de philosophie de langue française, qui s’est fixé pour cette année le thème, justement, de « La communication

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.016
Scholarly communication0.0130.008
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.155
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooksSame topicFiber-reinforced polymer compositesFrench-language works237,207