Suspected Crimean-Congo Haemorrhagic Fever Re-Infection: A Case Report with Atypical Serological Profile
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 53-year-old male farmer presented with clinical manifestations consistent with Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever (CCHF) virus infection, reporting a recent history of tick bite. To confirm the diagnosis, molecular and serological assays were performed on four specimens collected following the onset of illness. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detected CCHF virus RNA in the initial sample, while serum immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies were undetectable in all specimens. Notably, a robust immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody response was observed across all samples. The concurrence of detectable viral RNA with the presence of IgG antibodies, but the absence of IgM, in the acute phase sample suggests a potential case of CCHF virus re-infection. These findings hold significant implications for public health, particularly regarding our understanding of CCHF virus infection dynamics, diagnostics, and vaccine development strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".