DEVELOPING A SIMULATION-BASED DECISION SUPPORT TOOL TO IMPROVE CANCER CARE RESOURCE USE AND PATIENT ACCESS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The healthcare system delivers processes that involve complex interactions among different types of staff, equipment, and the patients that receive diverse medical services. These interactions often result in long waiting times for patients and poor utilization of staff and resources, aspects that need to be improved. This dissertation presents a study to address issues in these areas by considering complex dynamic behaviors, namely uncertainty, ambiguity, and incompleteness, present in such a system. The overall objective of this dissertation is to develop a simulation system for aiding decision-makers in managing operations, such as scheduling and other administrative policies making. A specific healthcare facility, the Saskatoon Cancer Clinic (SCC), is taken as the study vehicle, both for illustration and validation purposes. This dissertation involves experiments, based on the simulation of five different scenarios in the SCC operations environment, which represent the activities of the staff and patients, patients‟ pathways in the SCC, and physical resources (Reception, Medical Review Office, Phlebotomy, Examination Rooms). The system makes the following assumptions: (1) the patients are divided into two classes (New Patients and Returning Patients) and (2), cancers are classified into eight types. The patients are further characterized with other attributes: (a) the punctuality of coming to the clinic, (b) no-show, (c) cancelation, (d) the need of isolation (being infectious), (e) time spent with various staff (14 different types in total), (f) the number of times the patient received services by each staff during their visit, (g) the frequency of the appointments, (h) the time span between appointments, and (i) patient treatment plans. Each staff is characterized by (1) schedules, (2) work shifts, (3) vacation, (4) type of disease they have the expertise to serve, (5) types of patients they serve, (6) the time assigned for service, and (7) actual time of service. The modeling tool used for building the simulation system is Discrete Event Simulation (DES), specifically AnyLogic software, because it is best suited for the conceptualization and granularity level made for this system. The simulation system consists of (1) a BAseline Simulation model (BAS) (i.e. current operations), (2) five different What-If Scenarios (WISes) (variations of different structural changes in the system). The BAS is created first, followed by its extensive validation. The five WIS models are created to generate results for fourteen different Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) of the system. The KPIs characterize the patients, staff, and resource in the system, e.g. number of patients waiting for their first appointment with an oncologist, length of stay of patients in the clinic, utilization of examination rooms, etc. The KPIs are analyzed individually as well as aggregated with an equal weight; the domain of the real number values of the KPIs is a value range of (1, 6), where „6‟ denotes the worst and „1‟ denotes the best KPI. The result of the simulation for the five WISes is as follows: (1) Scenario 1 has a value of 1.93, which is ranked the first among all the five scenarios (having two oncologists sharing three examination rooms); (2) Scenario 3 has a value of 2.57, which is ranked the second among all the five scenarios – this scenario has a flexible lunch hour, and it has three new patients to be consulted per each four hour shift block; (3) Scenario 5 (3.36) is ranked the third, followed by Scenario 2 (3.71), and Scenario 4 (4.5), and the BAS (4.79) ranks last. This dissertation draws the following conclusions. First, there are ways to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of oncology clinics, as well as other ambulatory clinics. Second, patients benefit from the re-design of certain clinical administrative policies. Third, increasing the efficiency of the clinic, Canadian health dollars can be saved. Previous studies focused only on specific aspects, such as (1) patient wait times, (2) patient's schedules, (3) utilization of chemotherapy chairs, (4) utilization of nurses, (5) staff overtime, (6) staff schedule, in a non-integral manner, while this study takes an integral approach with the finest system granularity. The main scientific contributions of this dissertation in the field of operation management of complex healthcare systems are: (1) validating the effectiveness of the approach of human collaborative decision making based on the simulation of individual to individual interactions in medical treatment centers; (2) developing the procedure of constructing a discrete event dynamics simulation model for medical treatment centers with highly uncertain dynamics, including model construction and validation; (3) demonstrating the benefit of the approach along with the simulation system in reducing the waiting time of patients to receive treatments. This dissertation has provided evidence of improving the efficiency of complex healthcare systems, generating a positive impact to the quality of Canadian healthcare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".