MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7084179534

Braiding Counter-Stories: A Narrative Inquiry into Sport, Indigenous Identity, and Healing

2025· article· en· W7084179534 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAgriculture, Water, and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsIndigenousNarrativePersonal narrativeNarrative inquiryTraditional knowledgePopulationIndigenous education
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This project used narrative inquiry to explore the sport, physical activity, and education experiences of Indigenous post-secondary student-athletes in the Canadian prairies. In Saskatchewan, where Indigenous peoples represent 17% of the population (Statistics Canada, 2022), their presence in university athletics reflects a striking gap in athletic representation. At the University of Saskatchewan, only 3% (13 of 420) of student-athletes identify as Indigenous (N. Orr, personal communication, October 2023). This underrepresentation prompted a critical question: Why do Indigenous student-athletes remain marginalized in post-secondary sport? While existing literature documents the systemic barriers Indigenous communities face in accessing education and sport, rooted in the enduring impacts of colonization, there remains a lack of research that centers the voices and lived experiences of Indigenous student-athletes themselves. Narrative inquiry, grounded in the dimensions of temporality, place, and sociality (Clandinin, 2013), offered a way for three participants—Phoenix, Lily, and Sam—to share their personal journeys across time, connecting past experiences to their current realities. To guide this work, the research team drew on the braid as a conceptual and ethical metaphor, inspired by Robin Wall Kimmerer’s Braiding Sweetgrass (2013). The braid, formed through the interweaving of Indigenous knowledge, story, and relational accountability, helped us hold the layered, temporal, and relational nature of the narratives. It did not replace narrative inquiry but deepened our commitment to honoring Indigenous ways of knowing and being. Data was generated through three in-depth conversations with each participant, focusing on early experiences, transitions into post-secondary sport, and present-day reflections. Each narrative revealed how sport served as more than physical activity; it became a site of healing, cultural reconnection, and personal transformation amid the effects of intergenerational trauma. Through story, participants did not simply reclaim identity; they braided new narratives of resistance, ceremony, and hope. Although all three have since completed their athletic careers, sport continues to shape their lives and communities. These stories offer critical insights for institutions seeking to support Indigenous student-athletes, not by assimilating them, but by creating space for culturally grounded, relational, and holistic engagement in sport and education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicAgriculture, Water, and HealthFrench-language works237,207