MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7084232025

HORMONAL STATUS AND REPRODUCTIVE FUNCTION OF HEREFORD CATTLE CANADIAN AND SIBERIAN BREEDING

2016· article· en· W7084232025 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorpus luteumBreedHormoneReproductionAdaptation (eye)Beef cattlePregnancyThyroid function
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The process of adaptation of imported cattle to new technological and climatic conditions leads to morphological and functional restructuring of the body, which may cause a violation of reproductive function. In the article deals the dynamics of adrenal hormones (cortisol), thyroid (thyroxine, triiodothyronine) and evaluated reproductive function in beef Hereford cattle Canadian selection in the conditions of the Altai Territory. Our study was carried out under production conditions farm «Farm» in the Tselinskiy district of the Altai Territory in the period from 2012 to 2013. The object of the study were heifers Hereford breed of Canadian selection at the age of 11 to 16 months (n = 97). It was found that because of the high levels of cortisol in the initial phase of adaptation fertilizing the capacity of Canadian heifers was lower than those analogs Siberian breeding on 12.4% . The majority of imported non-pregnant animals had a persistent corpus luteum and ovarian hypofunction. Further adaptation of imported animals and the development of their pregnancy was accompanied by increased functional activity of the adrenal cortex and the high metabolism of thyroid hormones. Indicators of reproductive function in cows, heifers Canadian and Siberian breeding after giving birth were not significantly different.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.428
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.147
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicHypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesFrench-language works237,207