MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7084244620

EVALUATING THE POTENTIAL OF TEMPERATE INLAND MINERAL SOIL WETLANDS AS NATURAL CLIMATE SOLUTIONS

2025· article· en· W7084244620 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsWetlandBiogeochemical cycleClimate changeCarbon sequestrationGreenhouse gasRadiative forcingEcosystemTemperate climateCarbon cycle
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increasing global efforts aim to mitigate climate change by leveraging natural climate solutions (NCS), with temperate inland mineral soil wetlands emerging as key ecosystems due to their ability to sequester atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂) while providing numerous co-benefits. However, wetlands are considered substantial natural sources of methane (CH₄), a potent greenhouse gas (GHG) with a higher warming potential than CO₂. Therefore, even modest CH₄ emissions from wetlands could compromise their capacity as NCS. Further, anthropogenic climate change has been found to alter biotic and abiotic controls of wetland carbon fluxes, complicating our understanding of carbon cycling and associated flux patterns. Given the dual role wetlands play in the radiative forcing of climate and the sensitivity of wetland biogeochemical properties to anthropogenic climate change, their efficacy as NCS depends on three main factors: (1) the relative warming potential of wetland GHGs (i.e. CO₂ and CH₄) in the atmosphere; (2) the relative capacity of wetlands to sequester CO₂ versus emitting CH₄; and (3) the sensitivity of wetland carbon turnover processes to ongoing anthropogenic climate change. Comprehensive evaluations of the NCS capacity of wetlands requires (1) suitable CO₂-equivalent (e.q.) metrics to facilitate direct comparison between CO₂ sequestration and CH₄ emission; (2) biogeochemical models to predict long term wetland carbon fluxes under varying biotic and abiotic conditions; and (3) process-based models to simulate wetland climate feedback under diverse future climate scenarios. This thesis responds to these crucial needs by examining the impact of wetland state conversions on net wetland carbon budgets using three different CO₂-e.q. metrics. Further, using random forest models trained on environmental predictors, this thesis predicts long term wetland carbon fluxes for more than 200 wetlands in the Prairie Pothole Region. It also simulates wetland climate feedback loops under diverse future socioeconomic pathways using a process-based GHG perturbation model. It demonstrates that the use of dynamic GWP* CO₂-e.q. metric is essential for detecting climate benefits or detriments associated with wetland drainage and restoration. Dynamic GWP* outperforms static GWP and SGWP metrics in terms of aligning wetland net CO₂-e.q. budgets to their warming/cooling status. Based on GWP* and the GHG perturbation model, this research affirms that wetland conservation and restoration are viable strategies for promoting wetlands as NCS. Conservation of intact wetlands was shown to deliver immediate climate benefits consistent with IPCC timelines, while restoration offered longer-term benefits that depend heavily on CH₄ emissions from restored wetlands. This research also underscores that while wetlands act as long-term CO₂ sinks, their near-term effectiveness as NCS is increasingly compromised by warming-driven CH₄ intensification. The projected increase in CH₄ emissions may transform wetlands from climate regulators to amplifiers of global warming, especially under high-forcing future climate scenarios. These results highlight the urgency of pursuing sustainable development pathways that limit global temperature rise to below 1.5–2.0 °C, not only to preserve the NCS potential of wetlands but to prevent their transformation into reinforcing agents of climate change within the Earth’s climate system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207