MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7084256250

ОСОБЕННОСТИ АДАПТАЦИИ КРУПНОГО РОГАТОГО СКОТА ГОЛШТИНСКОЙ ПОРОДЫ В ЦЕНТРАЛЬНОМ РЕГИОНЕ РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ И ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕ ПРЕПАРАТА «АЙСИДИВИТ» ДЛЯ КОРРЕКЦИИ ИММУННОГО СТАТУСА И ОБМЕННЫХ ПРОЦЕССОВ

2009· article· ru· W7084256250 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldEngineering
TopicAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSelection (genetic algorithm)Function (biology)Production (economics)Beef cattle
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a paper the outcomes of the analysis razions for cows high deriving of milk, cows before sorts of the cows are reduced. Is paid attention on necessity of a modification of a level of an exchange energy for animals with a high genetic potential, with different efficiency and in the correspondence with a physiological condition. At a lack of adjustment razions for cattle golchtin breeds West-European and Canadian selection the violation of interchanging of fiber, Ca and P, drop of a level carotin and reserve phosphats is observed disproportion of buffer systems, violation of function of a liver and other organs. Reduced homeostasis, immunoinsufficiency of a condition and autoimmun processes reduce in a raise of a susceptibility of animals to infectious and invasions to illnesses, birth weakened, impractical of kalbs. Thus, are breaked reproduction, repair of herd. Are justified organizational, zootechnical and veterinary measures permitting to remove negative legs of technological processes and veterinary security of animal industries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.191
GPT teacher head0.518
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionFrench-language works237,207