A Thermal Modeling Toolkit for Continuous-Wave Gaussian Second-Harmonic Generation in KTP Crystal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We release an open-source finite-difference toolkit for computing temperature fields in continuous-wave (CW) second-harmonic generation (SHG) using potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) crystals under Gaussian end-pumping. The toolkit includes modules for geometry and material definitions, boundary and cooling models, and transient and steady-state finite-difference solvers. Users provide beam and crystal parameters along with cooling profiles, and the solver returns spatiotemporal temperature fields with radial and axial profiles as exportable datasets. This implementation consolidates previous work into a single versioned repository with reproducible pipelines and parameterized scenario sweeps covering temperature-dependent versus constant conductivity, convection with or without radiation, and heat-transfer coefficients from $6.5$ to $2.0 \times 10^{4}$~W~m$^{-2}$~K$^{-1}$. The compiled Fortran kernels include built-in benchmark reporting. Validation is performed by reproducing published temperature distributions and trends for KTP under Gaussian CW pumping. The code is available as an open-source GitHub repository and is released under the MIT license as version v1.0.0.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".