MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7084599075 · doi:10.4006/0836-1398-38.3.204

A singularity-free black hole model and its cosmological implications

2025· article· en· W7084599075 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Essays · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicKnowledge Societies in the 21st Century
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrimordial black holeBlack hole (networking)White holeGravitational collapseCosmic microwave backgroundNaked singularityStellar black holeElectroweak interactionBaryogenesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce a singularity-free black hole model based on a “Higgs-Buffer Zone” (HBZ), a 10 15 K central stellar core region where the Higgs field becomes inactive upon its collapse thus restoring electroweak symmetry. Grounded in the Standard Model, black hole interiors are treated as concentric layered spherical shells of distinct matter phases, including a solidlike hadron encompassing a perfect fluidlike quark‐gluon plasma shell encompassing a photon gaslike HBZ. Gravitational compression drives “evaporation” at the quark‐gluon plasma shell’s inner boundary. This phase transition due to external pressure causes the incompressible HBZ to expand (akin to a “negative pressure”), which halts singularity formation. Beyond stabilizing black holes, the HBZ model sheds light on early universe phenomena. Quantum fluctuations during the electroweak epoch could have triggered HBZ regions, driving bubble nucleation processes that influence primordial black hole formation, cosmic structure growth, and domain wall dynamics. The model also hints at gravitational wave signatures, cosmic microwave background anomalies, and possibly a novel mechanism for baryogenesis through CP-violating dynamics at HBZ boundaries. Furthermore, the HBZ’s effective negative pressure parallels inflationary cosmology, potentially acting as a complementary or secondary inflationary mechanism, linking black hole physics to dark energy or suggesting a possible compatibility with the Timescape model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it