MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7084606132 · doi:10.1002/jac5.70106

Effect of Pharmacist Involvement in Emergency Department Microbiological Culture Follow‐Up Services on Clinical Outcomes and Workflow: A Systematic Review

2025· article· en· W7084606132 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFixed Point Theorems Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharmacistEmergency departmentPsychological interventionClinical pharmacyData extractionMEDLINEBlood culture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Introduction Patients are often discharged from the emergency department ( ED ) while results from microbiological cultures are still pending. Most institutions provide culture follow‐up, but there is wide variability in the structure and personnel involved. Pharmacists are well suited for involvement in culture follow‐up services; though no systematic review has evaluated the impact of pharmacists in this clinical role. Objectives To assess the impact of pharmacists in ED culture follow‐up services on: (1) clinical outcomes; and (2) workflow. To characterize pharmacist roles/responsibilities as part of ED culture follow‐up services. Methods A search of the following databases was conducted: Medline, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and Web of Science. Studies were included if they described culture follow‐up services with pharmacist involvement in an ED setting. Screening and quality assessment were performed using Covidence software and the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale, respectively. Data extraction focused on study design, participants, types of cultures, and clinical and time‐based outcomes. Results Thirty‐three studies met inclusion criteria. Pharmacist involvement was consistently associated with reduced time from culture result to first attempted patient contact (ranging from 9.1–62.3 h, compared with 23.6–72 h without pharmacist involvement). Some studies found absolute reductions in ED revisit or readmission rates ranging from 4.2% to 15.4%, while others found no difference. Pharmacists significantly improved the appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy, with fewer missed interventions and less unnecessary antibiotic use. Current literature is limited by heterogeneity in study designs, small sample sizes, and a lack of randomized controlled trials. Conclusion Pharmacist involvement in ED culture follow‐up services demonstrates clear benefits in reducing time to initial review and patient contact. Further research is needed to address methodological limitations of current literature and to explore the benefits of negative culture follow‐up services, expanded pharmacy services through collaborative practice agreements, and strategies to enhance the efficiency of culture follow‐up services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score0.804

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.400 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it