MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7084617694 · doi:10.1109/tg.2025.3617866

Semi-Supervised Tile Embeddings: A General, Multigame Level Representation

2025· article· en· W7084617694 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Games · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicScience and Science Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTileRepresentation (politics)Scale (ratio)Video gameSimple (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Representing video game levels for level generation and analysis tasks remains an open problem. Existing approaches generally rely on hand-authoring or are game-specific. Tile embeddings are a general machine learned-representation for tile-based game levels, however they have thus far relied solely upon hand-authored representations of levels for training data. In this paper, we introduce Semi-Supervised Tile Embeddings (SSTE) which make use of semi-supervised learning to allow for training on levels lacking human authored representations. We evaluate SSTE over many experiments, finding that it performs equivalently or better than existing tile embeddings. Thus SSTE stands as the first general machine-learned level representation that can scale without requiring additional human labor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on GamesSame topicScience and Science EducationFrench-language works237,207