Tool for the evaluation of continuous-time OUR for biological processes optimisation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biodegradation is a key mechanism for removing organic contaminants in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) through biological processes. This study focuses on respiratory analysis using continuous oxygen uptake rate (OUR) curves to assess biodegradability and biological activity. The method involves continuous monitoring of dissolved oxygen in a respirometer, with advanced signal processing techniques to reconstruct accurate OUR curves. This enables the distinction between exogenous and endogenous respiration phases, providing a deeper understanding of substrate degradation dynamics. Case studies on domestic, industrial, and mixed wastewater highlight the method’s flexibility in evaluating various substrate and biomass interactions. The proposed approach offers enhanced precision compared with traditional regression models, supporting improved WWTP management by delivering detailed insights into oxygen consumption during biodegradation processes. In addition, this method is straightforward to implement, manage, and integrate into the routine operational protocols of a treatment plant. Unlike regression models, which approximate the OUR with mean values across predefined segments, the proposed approach reconstructs the entire signal continuously, improving temporal resolution and automatic identification of respiratory phases. It provides a practical tool for daily monitoring of biomass health, ensuring reliable and efficient plant performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".