MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7084677458 · doi:10.82291/fh.2024.1199551

A Report on the Anthropometric and Health Characteristics of Foreign Students at SRBIAU in 2023-2024

2024· article· en· W7084677458 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCOVID-19 epidemiological studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnthropometryOverweightObesityWaistContext (archaeology)Health tourismHealth promotion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to assess the anthropometric and health characteristics of foreign students at the Science and Research Branch of Islamic Azad University in Tehran, Iran, during the 2023-2024 period. A total of 400 non-Iranian students participated in this cross-sectional study. Anthropometric measurements, including weight, height, BMI, waist circumference, and body composition, were taken using standardized equipment. Physical activity levels, blood pressure, fasting blood sugar, and heart rate were also assessed. The results revealed a significant prevalence of overweight and obesity (21.75%), particularly among females (31.93%), and high rates of hypertension and prediabetes. The study found a high proportion of sedentary individuals (70.6%), which is a key contributor to the observed health risks. These findings highlight the importance of addressing obesity-related health issues, particularly in the context of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), and their economic impact. This data is crucial for the development of targeted health policies, such as medical tourism and insurance adjustments for individuals at higher health risks. The study concludes that proactive measures are essential to prevent and manage the health conditions prevalent in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.326
GPT teacher head0.498
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCOVID-19 epidemiological studies→French-language works237,207→