MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7084757439 · doi:10.5061/dryad.w6m905r0g

Supplemental data from: Manganese ore systems: A Canadian perspective on a critical element in the transition to a sustainable green economy within North America

2025· dataset· en· W7084757439 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Political and Economic Relations
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsManganeseElement (criminal law)Production (economics)Sustainable developmentTonnageComponent (thermodynamics)Battery (electricity)Current (fluid)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Manganese is a critical metal for modern economic development. Over 85% of manganese is used in the production of steel, where, as a desulphurising agent, it is an essential additive in all steelmaking, and as an alloying agent it makes a range of specialty steels. Additionally, it has significant uses in fertilizer, animal feed, rubber, glass, unleaded gasoline, ceramics, and paints. Currently over 80% of manganese ore comes from a few mines in Africa and Australia, but its production is facing two potential paradigm shifting developments over the next decade: the potential extraction of manganese nodules from the ocean floor; and within the transition to a green economy as a battery component for electric vehicles. Herein we present the first national inventory of Canada’s manganese occurrences in 90 years. While Canada has no current production, it does contain many occurrences, though most are too small to be viable operations. Presently, the deposits most suitable for mining are in the Woodstock area, New Brunswick. Not only are these relatively large tonnage and high grade, their mineral composition makes them more suitable for electric vehicle batteries than most current mines or in the future manganese nodules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.020
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0620.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicGlobal Political and Economic RelationsFrench-language works237,207